Total Pageviews

Mariposa Podcast 1965 Leacock Medal Winner War Stories by Gregory Clark

 


Mariposa Podcast

1965 Leacock Medal Winner

War Stories by Gregory Clark

 Link to Audio of Podcast 

Born in Toronto in 1892 (died 1977), Gregory Clark worked for the Toronto Star for close to forty years and later became a national personality and one of Canada’s best known writers as a columnist for the Weekend magazine


 He was also a decorated soldier – a hero at Vimy Ridge and other battles in WWI – and a war correspondent in the Second World War.

This podcast features an interview with Greg Clark’s great nephew – Tom Clark, the well
known broadcaster and journalist – whose 45 year career in television also took him to war zones around the world .

 

Dick Bourgeois-Doyle  (DBD)

You're obviously well placed to talk about Gregory Clark, not only as a family member, but as somebody who's echoed his career in a lot of ways.

I guess the obvious question is ‘Did you know him well?’

 

Tom Clark

Yeah, I got to know Greg really well, not so much as a child because I knew him as sort of the old uncle and so on. But when I really got to know him was when I got into journalism. Even as a very junior reporter, Greg took a real interest in what I was doing - wasn't so keen on the fact that I was going into television. And he always thought that that would come and go and was probably right. But nevertheless, when he moved into the King Edward Hotel in downtown Toronto, he had a small suite there where he lived, and every Thursday, I would go and have lunch with him at the hotel, and we would usually start off in his suite and sit around and tell a few stories.

And then we'd go downstairs, and we'd have lunch, and then I go back to work.

I'll tell you one thing that he did when he was at the King Edward Hotel.

The first lunch. So I looked at my watch, we were up in his room, and I said “Well, look, you know, it's now 12:15, we ought to get down for lunch”. And he said, okay, and he stood up sprightly. He was in good shape. I went to open the door, and he said, “Hang on a sec.” He said, “You're not doing this, right”. So he goes into a closet and he finds a wheelchair. I said, ”What are you doing with a wheelchair?” And he said, “Look and learn.”

So we get to the elevator, he sits in the wheelchair, he says now push me into the elevator, we went down to the main floor. And if you went from the elevator directly to the dining room, you just go literally across the lobby. So I started heading that way. And he said, “No. We're going to go all around the lobby.” So I pushed him all around the lobby. And then I discovered why. Because about every three feet, somebody would stop us and say, “Oh, Mr. Clark” -  not me but Greg – “so nice to see you.”  And he say, “Well, very nice to see you too.” But by the time we got to the dining room, he had spoken to about 15 different people. And he said at my age, he said, “that's how you keep things going”. I never, never forgot that. He was not only a great writer, and a great raconteur, but he was a great showman as well. He understood the importance of living the part that he had given to himself.

 

DBD 

He was described in quite a bit of the material I read as a great personality. So I think that story kind of hints at that.

 

 

 

Tom Clark 

Well, he had a bet with the staff at the King Eddie that if there was thunder and lightning between the hours of 9pm and midnight, they would bring him a small bottle of scotch. And  every morning when he went down, he looked at the staff and he’d say, “Did you hear that storm last night? I think it hit about 10 o'clock.”

 

DBD 

So you guys, the two of you come from quite a long line of journalists. I think his grandfather was an early editor, the Star and your dad founded Canada's Newswire?

 

Tom Clark 

Yeah. Yeah, there's a sort of lineage, such as it is:  that was Greg's father, and my grandfather's father. So Greg and my grandfather were brothers. Their father was J.T. Clark, who started the modern Toronto Star with Joe Atkinson. And so they sort of grew up as the sons of a an esteemed newspaperman in Toronto although J.T. at that point was not a reporter on the street. He was the Managing Editor of the Toronto Star, and they learned a lot from him. 

And so it wasn't surprising that after the First World War, both of them went into journalism full time. My grandfather worked for the Globe and Mail for a period of time, Uncle Greg worked for the Toronto Star. And then my grandfather got out and ended up in advertising and then did a whole bunch of other things after that.  Greg as you know, stayed in it right through to being a war correspondent in World War Two, and then went on with his partner artist Jimmie Frise to write the back page of the Weekend Magazine for years and years and years. So they and I, I guess, come by it honestly.

 

 

DBD 

Did this context help you presume a career in journalism or did you just come at it on your own?

 

Tom Clark 

I got into journalism because around our dining room table, it wasn't anything foreign or mysterious. It was something that everybody in the family at one time or another was involved with including an aunt of both Greg and my grandfather's who was the first female editor of the Clinton Examiner newspaper. So I mean, it ran in various forms in the family. What I'm saying is that when I said to my mother and father “I think I'm going to pursue a career in journalism,” there was nothing unusual about that. So whereas I think for a lot of people going into it, it's a little bit scary. For me, it was a completely known country; I already had the guidebook.

 

DBD 

The thing that intrigues me most about Greg Clark is how he retained that ability to see the humour  and the lighter side of life, especially after coming out of the experiences of the First World War and then other tragedies that visited him over his life. He just had some kind of ability to compartmentalize or something. Does that resonate with you? From what you've already said, it sounds like his humour was genuine.

 

Tom Clark 

It was – but Greg was a very complicated man, I think as most humorists are.  And I think you're right to use the expression that he “compartmentalized” his humour because Greg was deeply affected by both wars. He had, you know, triumph and tragedy in both conflicts and a couple of his stories are deeply, deeply moving, without any trace of humour at all. And that really spoke to what affected his entire life. I mean, there in the second war itself, he managed to go visit his son on the frontlines. I've got a photograph of him where he brought his son Murray, a lemon pie, which was Murray’s favorite dish, and Greg had to get special dispensation as a war correspondent to go visit his son. And the very next day, his son was killed by a phosphorus grenade. That made an enormous impression on him. 

Yet, at the same time, in the invasion of Sicily, my grandfather, Greg's brother, at that time was the head of information for the Canadian Armed Forces. And as the Canadians moved up through Sicily and into Italy, Greg got in touch with his brother, Joe, and said, “We've got to meet up.” So Greg goes down into this little town in Italy, where he finds his brother, my grandfather, who in his early years before the war - after the First World War, and before the Second World War - was actually courted by the MET in New York to come and join them as a member of their opera company. He was a brilliant singer, great opera singer. And so Greg took them up to the balcony of this small little Italian town. And of course, the townspeople who just were liberated and I think they were all pretty drunk. And Joe turned to Greg who said, “Here is your MET moment.” And my grandfather sang the Nessun dorma, which would have been a magnificent thing to see.

But this is all Greg; he set this up. And again, no humour in it, but he found the profundity in a lot of things. And I think that the humour saved him from going back to a lot of the memories and a lot of the things that had affected him as a young man,

 

DBD 

His Leacock winning book is War Stories.  It's a collection of stories from the war, some from Italy. I believe there is no mention of his son's death that might have happened outside of the collection, but I found a pattern there - he would tell a very poignant story from the war, something very moving, but then there would be like a funny twist at the end. Or he would tell a funny story - one that I remember, in this regard was - he was a great fly fisherman, right?

 

Tom Clark

Yeah.

DBD

And in the war, and he stumbled upon this place in England with some friends, which was an iconic site for fly fishermen, and he told about the day and at the end, they ate the fish. And then – in just like one sentence at the end, you realize they're heading off to Normandy the next morning.  It  was that kind of technique, and you're somebody who's probably told thousands of stories in the process of your career. Does that ring true with you as an approach?

 

Tom Clark 

Yeah, you know, it does, and I've sort of melded a little bit of Greg’s style into mine. You know, we're dealing with a completely different age.  In Greg's day, of course, it was all newspapers, some radio. In my age, it was virtually all television and some newspapers. But you know, Greg always told me that especially as a war correspondent, and one of the most famous war correspondents that this country had in World War Two, that he left the main story up to the reporters who would hang out at military headquarters and write all the this happened that happened, they went there, they did this. And Greg said “I always wanted to do the secondary story because that's where the truth lay.” 

And so he’d do things like during the battle you mentioned, you know, his fly fishing, well he took his fly rod with him through the battlefields of Italy and France and Belgium. And very often during the battle, he’d just go down to a stream and start fishing. And he also had his binoculars, but they weren't there to spot the enemy. They were there to watch birds because he loved bird watching. And inevitably, he told me, what he tried to do is at least in the second paragraph put in something either about fishing or about a bird that he had just seen as almost as a subclause in a sentence. He said the reason he did it, he said, was to send secret code back to birdwatchers in Canada to say, “Don't worry, everything's gonna be okay.” You know, he invented this code himself, but he lived by it. 

And so in my own work, I've been to a number of wars, and I agreed with him that story always was the second story, not the first story.  The first story is all about officials and generals and, you know, big policy; the real story lies with that little nugget that you find somewhere, that little bit of humanity that you can go in and examine and look at, and that will tell you more about the war more about the situation than anything you're going to hear at military headquarters. I've done both, and I never found military headquarters to be particularly satisfying as a journalist. So in that sense, yeah, I sort of followed what Greg had decided was the best way to cover a war.

 

DBD 

Well, you answered a number of my questions in that response because I was wondering if there was a technique that kind of echoed on - and other things you said sort of reinforce that notion that Greg Clark is worthy of study as some of the professionals have hinted. My ambition is just to celebrate people like him. It's stunning, how quickly people forget them.

 

Tom Clark 

These were the people Richler and Berton, and Greg, among others, who really sort of defined the modern story of Canada; they sort of told us who we were, in many respects, and you know, that always changes, I get that, and we morph into other things, and so on. But at least we had that in that era,  people who were telling us who we were as a country and as a people. But we were talking about the complications of Greg and war, and the fact that he always tried to find humour somewhere in there, part of the secret code, he said, that he was sending back to people. 

One story that he wrote, though, really stuck with me. And that was one of his worst stories where he described in a sense, having almost a hallucination. He was there for the dedication of the Vimy memorial in 1936, or something like that. And he had trouble sleeping, because of course he had fought Vimy Ridge and the memorial, the memorial is there, obviously. And he describes how he gets up in the middle of the night because he can't sleep and he walks down to the old battlefields along the hill, and all of a sudden, he starts seeing these bivouacs, these little fires with men sitting around. And he thought at first they were there as part of the celebration that was going to happen the next morning. And then he looked at them and all the people sitting around the fires have little bunches of flowers that they were holding up to various parts of their body. And he started talking to them. And it became clear to him, as he wrote in the story, that he was talking to the ghosts of Vimy Ridge. And the flowers were being held over the parts of their body that had been hit by enemy fire and had killed them. And they were fascinated to talk to Greg, these ghosts. And they chatted about all sorts of things. And then they said, “You know, our sacrifice must have made this world a wonderful place. Tell us, Greg, just how wonderful the world is now.” And Greg said that he lost it and had to go back to the hotel. I mean, it was a very poignant story. You know, the end of the story is where he said I didn't have the heart to tell them what had happened after their deaths. I think that got closer to the reality of where he lived through those experiences.

Now, the war didn't define him entirely. I mean, he wrote acres and acres of stories on just human life, boating, cottages and he was always respectful of people high up in authority, but never took them seriously. In any story he wrote about somebody in a position of great power, there was always an element somewhere in that story about how slightly ridiculous the person was, and in a gentle way, his humour was always gentle. It was never confrontational, and it was never harsh. But you couldn't read those stories without knowing exactly who Greg was and what his view of the world was and about his view of power. And he was everyman in a way. And he was not high and mighty, he didn't have a lot of money. He knew the rich and famous, but he wasn't rich. And he never thought he was as famous as all those other people that he was talking to. So that was reflected in his writing as well. And I think that's what endeared him to so many people. 

He was he was your uncle. I mean, he was the guy who loved sitting by the side of a lake and contemplating on something and it was always gentle humour about what was happening on the lake. We've lost that. I don't know of anybody out there. Now, who does that type of gentle humour? It's a shame. I think, you know, hopefully it'll come back. But Greg was the ultimate practitioner of it. There's so many, many stories. I know that Greg and I talked about stuff of his that I read; I think John Carroll in his book, The Life and Times of Greg Clark sort of summed up a lot of this. And Jock really got it quite well.

I'll tell you one last little bit about Greg, which I think is instructive. I was at lunch with him one day, and he leaned back and he said, “Now he said we have got five more of these lunches. And then we're done.”  I said, “What are you talking about?” And he said,” Well, I am narrowing my circle of people that I interact with.”

And I said, “Okay, and I'm a victim of that.” And he said, “Everybody is going to become a victim of that, because I intend to die in about a year from now. And as I progress towards that moment, I'm just going to start reducing the number of people who I interact with, so that when I go, I've already said goodbye to everybody.” And he said, “Don't worry, you've got another couple of months to go.”

Well, sure enough, he died almost to the day that he said he was gonna die a year out. He planned it. Now. Greg, you know, I say planned it, I didn't know maybe that was part of the performance of Greg Clark, who always dressed the part, he always wore the little porkpie hat. He didn't wear a coat. He wore a cape. You know, he did all these things. So this was his ultimate demise: planned as he said it was or was it just a good guess? I don't know. But in the end, it was the perfect exit for Greg Clark.

1983 Leacock Medal - Outside Chance of Maximilian Glick by Morley Torgov


1983 Leacock Medal winner

The Outside Chance of Maximilian Glick

by Morley Torgov

Click here for link to Audio of Podcast

 This podcast is about the 1983 Leacock Medal winner, The Outside Chance of Maximilian Glick, the story of a young boy preparing for his bar mitzvah with the help of an eccentric rabbi mentor. The book not only won the Leacock medal, it prompted a television series and a motion picture, set and filmed in part in Beausejour, Manitoba.

 

But the book itself was set in the imaginary Northern Ontario town called Steelton, not unlike the author Morley Torgov’s native Sault Ste. Marie.  

This interview with Morley, who turns 95 years of age in 2022, talked about the book’s success and his future plans for Maximilian Glick.

 

 

Morley Torgov (MT)

 

Steelton is a fictional town, but actually, the west end of the Soo was known as steel town because of its proximity to the Algoma steel plant.

 

 

DBD

 

Talking about the Algoma steel plant, it reminds me of one of your metaphors in Maximilian Glick about (it being like) dragons belching fire and smoke and swirling around. And that was one of the things that I admired about your writing – that is the creative metaphors that always, you know, seem to be apt and effective. Did those just flow to you? Or is it something that you consciously work at when you're writing?

 

 

MT

 

No, I consciously work at it because I'm a slow writer, and I tried to be as colourful as I can without being pretentious because sometimes you can overdo it of course.

 

Morley Torgov (MT)

 

That's the trick. That's the trick finding that balance.

 

 

MT

 

I don't say this to be to be boastful. But I'm a very tough self editor, I will quite often write six, seven, ten drafts of something before I get exactly what I want. I envy writers who can do it a lot faster and a lot easier. But with me, it's hard work.

 

 

DBD

 

When you decided to write The Outside Chance of Maximilian Glick, what was the driver? Was it a desire to tell a coming of age story with a quirky mentor? Or was it about the Lubavitcher Rabbi being dropped into a small town?

 

 

MT

 

Initially, it was the Lubavitcher Rabbi being dropped into a small town because what generated that book was a news item in the Canadian Jewish News, which was a newspaper at the time. And this was back around 1979.  A rather sad story about a conventional rabbi and by conventional I mean, he looked like anybody else, you know, shirt and tie. That conventional rabbi in Moncton, New Brunswick, who just before the High Holidays, Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, stepped out in the wrong place on the street and was, I think, killed by a bus.

 

And the congregation who were desperately in need of a replacement, got in touch with the Canadian Jewish Congress in Montreal, who dispatched a young Rabbi out to Moncton to help out for the holidays. And the rabbi turned out to be a member of the Lubavitcher sect, these are the people who wear these great big, huge black hats, and long black coats, white socks, black shoes, and have dreadlocks in their hair. And they're very peculiar looking people, at least they are if you've never seen them before. And when I read the piece, as sad as the death of the earlier rabbi was, I just found it potentially hilarious. The idea of a lot of people, mostly Christian, of course, in a place like Moncton and seeing this man on the streets for the first time, never having seen anybody like him before.

 

And of course, to some extent, he constituted an embarrassment for the congregation. Because the Jewish congregation preferred a low profile at the time. Anyway, long story short, I found a piece in the end to be hilariously funny and decided it had the makings of a book. And what I had to do was throw in another character. And I threw in this young, Maximilian Glick, who's about to have his thirteen-year bar mitzvah. And that's what generated it.

 


DBD

The Bourgeois part of my extended family hovers around Moncton. So I'm going to hold on to that light association with Maximilian Glick.



MT

 

Oh, really?

 

 

DBD

Not the death of the rabbi, of course, but yeah, the humour there.  Did you personally see yourself in Rabbi Teitelman? I mean, you were a person who had a core career as a lawyer, but was a humorist on the side.

 

 

MT

 

Yes, you’ve got it exactly. He was frustrated because what he really wanted was not to be a rabbi but a stand-up comedian. And what I really wanted was not to be a lawyer, but to be a journalist, and primarily a humorist.

 


DBD

Well, I think you succeeded in knitting the two together like the spider’s first spinning.

 

 

MT

 

Well, thank you for saying that. I was a little disappointed in the movie because when I wrote the book, I intended it to be a bit of a fable.

 

You may recall at the end of the book, we're not 100 per cent positive what happened to the rabbi.  We know that we think he became a stand-up comedian, but it's not nailed right down, and I wanted to leave it that way. But when the movie was done, apparently movies don't sell with endings that are fables. And so, they decided to end up with a kind of Disneyesque happy ever, ever after kind of thing.

 

DBD

With everybody dancing around there.

 

 

MT

 

Yeah, everybody dancing around. That's not what I wrote. But there it is for what it's worth.

 

 

DBD

The rabbi, in his infamous speech, told a joke about Protestants feeling guilty about their sins, climbing on a soapbox in the street corner, Catholics climbing into a box and whispering their sins but …

 

 

MT


And Jews locking themselves in the basement or writing their biographies or autobiographies. And I think that's very true. I just got finished reading a biography of Philip Roth. And I think that's truer than ever. This was not an autobiography. But it was a biography of Roth.  But I think a lot of Jewish writers, mostly what they are writing, whether they realize it or not is autobiography?

 

 

DBD

Well, I think the guilt is maybe a light factor in anything you've written. Maximilian Glick, I think I heard that there may be a musical in the works?

 

 

MT

 

Yes, some people are working on a musical version. As you know, it was first a novel, then the movie, and then a TV series. It ran for a couple of years on the CBC. And then I had the idea a couple of years ago, after watching for probably the 25th time, Fiddler on the Roof that it occurred to me that Maximillian Glick had a lot of what it would take to make a good musical because music is a large part of the lives of these two young people in the book. So I had some lucky connections, and I spoke with some people. And now a musical is in the works, just hope I'm around if and when it comes to fruition.

 

 

DBD

Pianist on the Roof.

 

 

 

MT

 

That's an idea.  Pianist on the Roof.

 

 

DBD

 

Of course, humour and music permeated almost all your works. And as you mentioned the other day, you were shortlisted for a couple of other Leacock Medals.  Yes, I was on the shortlist in 1991 for a book published in 1990, called St. Farb’s Day about a lawyer getting into a lot of difficulties. And then again in 2003 for Stickler and Me, which was published in 2002, about a lawyer in a small town who gets into trouble and who decides to take it on the lam with his grandson. Both of them had a lot of humor in them. They were both shortlisted. But they weren't medal winners.

 

 

DBD

 

And you were, of course, responsible for the mystery series, the Inspector H Hermann Preiss Price books.

 

 

MT

 

That has to do a lot with my love of classical music, because that's a series of seven books. And each one deals with one of the famous composers of the 19th century and involves usually a murder. And there are some funny bits. These are not really blood and guts kind of stories. They have a fair amount of humour in them as well.

 

 

DBD

 

When was the last time you wrote one of those books?

 

 

MT

 

Well, the last one was finished just earlier this year. And I'm working on a book of short stories for the first time. I've got seven of them done and one more in the works. And then I'm hoping some publisher will be interested. The thing is, at my age and this is not an original thought. I think a lot of people will say this, the busier you are and the more you ignore your age, the better off you are.

 

 

DBD

 

I'm staring at my 70th birthday next year.

 

 

MT

 

You don’t sound 70, I gotta tell you.  You sound more like you're in your 40s.

 


DBD

I'm definitely immature. But you're a great inspiration, Morley. I wish I could rhyme off the names of all the Leacock medalists that passed their 90th birthday.

 

 

MT

 

Well, I don't know how many there were. But I do know this much. If you're a writer, keep writing. Because if you don't keep writing, as it has been said, you become posthumous before your time.

 

 

1975 Leacock Medal - A Good Place to Come From by Morley Torgov

 


1975 Leacock Medal winner

A Good Place to Come From 

by Morley Torgov


Click Here for Audio of Podcast

This podcast episode is about the 1975 Leacock Medal winner, A Good Place to Come From by Morley Torgov. It is a collection of stories that flow from the author's days growing up in the 1930s and 40s within the small Jewish community in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. Morley Torgov who lives in Toronto will celebrate his 95th birthday in 2022.

 

DBD

Thanks so much for doing this. And it's no small honour to be able to talk to you.

 

Morley Torgov (MT)

Oh you’re welcome. Thank you.

 

DBD

I guess you must have been in your 40s when you wrote A Good Place to Come From?

 

MT

It was published when I was 47. I started writing it, let me see, my father died in 1965. And his death sort of liberated me to some extent, to use a lot of the material from my childhood and my teen years, and so on and so forth.

And I started writing A Good Place to Come From probably a year or two after he died and it was submitted about 1973 in an unfinished form and rejected by a number of publishers. But by the time I had enough in 1974, Beverly Slopen, my literary agent was able to convince Lester and Orpen to publish it. And it sort of took off.  What helped a lot was a terrific review by William French in The Globe and Mail. And from there on, it really did quite well.

DBD

So your father passed away in 1965. That was going to be one of my questions. The   book has two sides to it. One is it's been celebrated as a window on Jewish life in the small Canadian community where you were growing up, this being Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario that we're talking about. But I couldn't tell whether the prompt for the book was more desire to celebrate your dad, or maybe just have him as a vehicle for talking about these other things?


MT

Well, there's a bit of both. The book is dedicated to him. Dedication reads to him “in lieu of candles.” And he's a certainly a major force in my life, and a major character in the book. But it's not just confined to him alone, of course, because there was a rather rich, gold mine, I guess you'd call it of characters in the Soo Jewish community, not all of them lovable. But all of them very interesting. So I had a lot of material available to me.

 

DBD
The book is a collection of short stories.  Were any published independent prior to the book's publication?

 

MT

Yes. One or two of them were published in a little magazine called Viewpoints, which was published by a couple in Montreal. And they bought the first two pieces that I wrote way back around 1971. And those two pieces got a fair amount of attention at the time in the Viewpoints Magazine. And I also sold one short little piece to the Globe and Mail weekend magazine, which was published, I guess, about 1973. And the Editor of The Globe said, “Why don't you publish some more of these stories?” and a couple of other people said the same. And then the next thing I knew, I was working on a book.

 

DBD

Was Making of the President 1944, one of those short stories there were published prior to the book?

MT

No. That that was fresh material.

 

DBD

It's the one (story) that seems to stick in a lot of people's minds as capturing the dynamism of the community.  As an outsider, you know, sort of peering into this portal on the Jewish community, I found the book engaging, but it was because of those universal themes of parent and child relationships.

 

MT

That's one of the things that I think surprised me most. That was how universal the book struck people because I received quite a number of letters from people who were not Jewish even, and who said that they found the themes in the book, very universal. As you say, parent-child relationships, racial relationships, economic problems, and so on and so forth. The book turned out in some people's views to be much more universal than I thought it was going to be.

 

DBD

I was wondering as a writer whether you were conscious of that tension between trying to speak to the universal but give enough description of the community. It seemed to ebb and flow in a really elegant way. I remember one thing that I appreciated was the detail that you went into to describe the venerated role that those two New York Yiddish newspapers Forward and The Day had in your home because I wouldn't have appreciated the references to careers in medicine that your father made unless they had that preamble. So yeah, it was both universal and in enlightening or instructive to people.


MT

Well, those two newspapers were what kept a lot of Jewish people alive in small towns, because they were the connection between living in out of the way places like Sault Ste.  Marie and knowing what's doing in the rest of the world. Those two newspapers, and frankly, a couple of non-Jewish publications were very much part of our lives in Sault Ste. Marie: one was Life magazine, which was a relatively new magazine back in those days. And now there was Time magazine; they were the things that connected us to the world. We didn't have television, of course. There were movies, but the movies really weren't the kind of thing to learn the news from. But given the two most popular Jewish newspapers from New York, plus magazines like Time and Life, that's what sort of made us aware that there was another world out there.

 

DBD
When I first read the book, I wasn't too sure what you thought of the Soo, but I'm pretty sure now that you have affection for the place?

 

MT

Well, I have a great deal of affection for the Soo. And frankly, I wouldn't be what I am or who I am whatever that is, without having been born in the Soo and without having spent my childhood and my teen years in the Soo. So I owe the Soo a great deal. But I'd really be a hypocrite if I denied the fact that I couldn't wait to get out. Because there was a great big world out there. And I knew what I wanted to do. I couldn't do it in Sault St. Marie.  In those days, it was a city of about 25,000. It was really at the end of the railway line literally. And classical music, for instance, was something you got about once a week, maybe twice if you were lucky. And there was this constant itch that I had to get out into the bigger world. So yes, I owe this Soo a lot. But I'd be a liar if I said I would want to spend the rest of my life there as the Soo was in those days. Today, of course, the Soo has a much larger population and is a much more sophisticated city, but not in my time.

 

DBD
I was thinking as you were saying that, that your book - and maybe it probably it wasn't intended directly, but it is sort of an homage to the culture of Northern Ontario. There's a phrase in there where you were talking about scratching, scraping, building up, tearing down, surviving. I thought those words could have been applied to anybody trying to make it in Northern Ontario in the early part of the last century.

 

MT

Oh yeah. I'm not suggesting that my experience was unique. I think a lot of (people),  certainly a lot of Jewish kids in particular, were yearning for some kind of broader Jewish experience, which you couldn't possibly get in a small town. So yes, we had to get out of the city. Our parents even encouraged us to get out. I know very few parents in Sault Ste. Marie who urged their children to stay there.

 

DBD

Most of your fans, of course, know that your life was dominated by a career in corporate law. When you left it would have been to not necessarily pursue law, but you would have gone to university down south, what was your first degree in?


MT

Originally, my father was very anxious for me to be a doctor. As far as he was concerned, there was only one profession in the world. And that was medicine. And he actually hated lawyers. And we had quite a lot of tension between him and me over that subject. So I went for one year to the University of Chicago and took some science courses, but I was not happy with it at all. And I transferred to the University of Toronto, and eventually got my own way. Well, actually a compromise. I wanted to go into journalism, and I compromised with my father and went into law, which he was not thrilled about although he accepted it eventually

 

DBD

As preferable to a career in the nefarious world of journalism?

 

MT

Well, journalism, had a funny reputation in Jewish life. On one hand, there were many great Jewish journalists and writers, Isaac Bashevis Singer, at the time, was one of the greatest and still is one of the greatest of all time. There were a number of popular and excellent Jewish journalists and writers. But on the other hand, old fashioned Eastern European Jews regarded literature as a third-rate kind of profession because so many writers in Europe live from hand to mouth, literally. And this is not what our parents wanted for us. They wanted the security of a good old-fashioned profession like medicine, number one, dentistry, number two, and maybe a lawyer if you couldn't be anything better.

 

DBD

Of course, you won the Leacock medal. Could you describe the impact of the Leacock medal on (your career)?

 

MT

Well, I'll never forget, I was sitting in my office, I guess it was in May of 1975, and Eve Orpen of blessed memory called me. She was one of the publishers of Lester and Orpen. And she said, “Morley, are you sitting down?” I still remember that line, “Morley, are you sitting down?” I said, “Yes, I am. Why?”  And she said, “You won the Leacock award.”

And it was a huge thrill. It was the beginning of a long relationship that I have had with the folks that are in Orillia, the Leacock people. A very long, rich, happy, lots of fun kind of relationship over many, many years. It’s been a big part of our lives, both Anna Pearl’s, my wife, and my life.

 

DBD
I know your son passed away tragically, some 10 years ago, and I hesitate to ask, but I hope your wife is still with you?

 

MT

Oh, yes. She's sitting across the table in the dining room as we speak.

 

DBD

That's wonderful.

 

MT

And now she's 91.  Ninety-one going on 26.

Yes, we lost our son, who was a lawyer who died of cancer. But fortunately, our daughter-in-law is here and two wonderful grandchildren. One of them just got called to the bar. And then our daughter is married to a television writer living in Santa Monica, California, and they have two children, who are both university graduates and are out in the world making a living.

So, we are very lucky.